Sunday, May 13, 2012

HANGIN's TOO GOOD FOR 'EM

We had a little get-together yesterday, to celebrate the beginning of the Season of Grilling Meat. At one stage in the conversation it was pointed out that time-honored truism: a Liberal is simply a Conservative who hasn't been mugged yet. I remarked that no matter how flaming, left-wing a Liberal is, any and all arguments regarding the death penalty go right out the window the second you bring up child-rapists.

Tooling around the 'net today I found
THIS GEM from member of Team STORMBRINGER Oswald Bastable:

GALLOWS-BAIT

"There are no words strong enough to describe the horror captured in the images collected by child abuser Stephen John Laing.

There is also no way to prevent the 28-year-old, upon his release from jail, soliciting more material to trade in the murky online world he's created from inside his West Auckland home.

"He's had all the help in the world that's available to him and this is still happening," Judge Claire Ryan said at a court hearing a few days ago.

She sent the IT graduate to jail for a further five years. It was his fourth conviction . . ."




In another article - regarding the permanent incarceration of the worst of these sick fuckers - it was mentioned that the UN objects to indefinite imprisonment.


FOR THE RECORD:

In my family we have a Standard Operating Procedure for this sort of scumbag, and it does not involve the Judicial System. And the UN can go to hell - I don't remember being given the opportunity to vote for them, one way or the other.

In the words of the inimitable Judge Roy Bean: "I never saw a horse that needed stealin', but I seen a lot of men who needed hangin'."



STORMBRINGER SENDS




4 comments:

  1. I think the reference to the UN was a sidebar to this story. Here is an extension to that sidebar....Have you noticed the increase in reporting of UN deaths due to terroism?
    Why do I as an American taxpayer really care about keeping track of UN deaths. Ok, Ok that sounds really hard and uncaring; sorry Mom.
    But I hope you get my point; why is the death of a UN soldier,peace keeper, whatever front page news here in Madison, WI?
    I think it has to do with innoculating the American public to view themselves as "just part of the world".
    Someday I'm going to write an article about the incremental chipping away of American ideals.

    Steve

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stormbringer- my grateful thanks for your support. My SOP would be much the same- a man has to do what a man has to do- and too often does not.

    For your readers not aquainted with myself, I worked for some time in Corrections, in a prison specializing in the long term lockup (25% for life) of 'the sort of subhuman refuse that could not be kept in mainstream without generating huge amounts of paperwork'

    (which you get when the shit-heads are impaled on a mop handle)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doesn't seem complicated to me. There must be some chain and concrete blocks in New Zealand, and the place is surrounded by water...

    ReplyDelete
  4. First, The Chipper-Shredder Compost pile for this scumbag would be too good for him. It's a start though.

    Otherwise, in response to Anonymous (Steve), It’s funny you should but because you stated and asked the following, "I think it has to do with inoculating the American public to view themselves as "just part of the world".
    Someday I'm going to write an article about the incremental chipping away of American ideals".

    Bottom line is that the media may actually be setting us up, or trying to nullify us into accepting the upcoming ratification of the UN International Criminal Court (ICC) Bill being brought before the senate, by Hillary Clinton on Obamas’ behalf.

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/10020-big-push-for-uns-international-criminal-court

    An excerpt from the above links states:

    In spite of their incessant prattling about dedication to transparency, the globalists have been obdurately opaque about key features of the ICC, such as:
    No right to a trial by a jury of ones peers;
    No right to habeas corpus;
    No right to bail;
    No right to a speedy trial;
    No protection against indefinite pre-trial detention;
    No protection against being transported to foreign lands

    The United States and other countries could find itself on a world stage defending its own national right and identity verses a worldwide UN collective, with the US paying bill. Does anyone really doubt this to be goal of our current leadership?

    ReplyDelete